The Jerusalem Post
-
Search JPost CD-Rom Syndication E-mail Edition Subscriptions Reprint
Archives Features

Services

 


Document
Basic Advanced Saved Help
Start a New Search
Buy Complete Document: Abstract Abstract Full Text Full Text
Will Israel survive?
[Daily Edition]
Jerusalem Post - Jerusalem
Author: RUTHIE BLUM
Date: Oct 25, 2007
Start Page: 13
Section: Features
Text Word Count: 4132
Abstract (Document Summary)

I don't think anyone's ever thought the Palestinians were an existential threat to Israel. But there will be an ongoing danger of terrorism, regardless of whether Israel withdraws unilaterally, or whether there's some negotiated solution, because there will always be radical Islamic elements who will never accept a Jewish state in the Middle East and will try to undermine peace. But Israel has lived and can live with terrorism. It's not a good thing, obviously, but it doesn't threaten the state's survival.

I'm saying we have to understand that there's a limit to what we can do about media coverage. If there's an inaccuracy, we correct it. We try to educate, refute, inform journalists. But, what interests me as a political scientist is what the real impact of such bias is. And I argue that there's very little. Where policy and public opinion are concerned, there's no evidence that media bias hurts Israel over the long run. I mean, why do we care about media bias? We care because the assumption is that the American public, and hence the US government, will turn on Israel as a result. But look at the facts. In 1967, when Israel was seen as David who defeated the Arab Goliath, a Gallop poll found that, when asked the question: "With whom do you sympathize more - Israel or the Arabs?," about 55% said Israel. Now, let's fast-forward past intifada I and II; Reagan vs. Begin; Shamir vs. [George W. Bush]. After presumably having had anti-Israel media bias for 40 years, Gallop asked the same question, and the results were that 58% expressed sympathy for Israel.

I have very little expectation of that meeting. Everyone who analyzes the situation sees [Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud] Abbas as someone who's too weak to deliver, no matter how good his intentions may be. I'm not saying that because things are going to be looking up in 2010 that there'll be no violence. There's a reasonable possibility of a war with Syria; there's a reasonable possibility of intifada III. But these aren't going to destroy Israel; they're part of the ongoing situation.

Buy Complete Document: Abstract Abstract Full Text Full Text

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)

Log In


ProQuest Archiver

© 1995-2008 The Jerusalem Post

-
  [Feedback] [JPost.com] © 1995-2008 The Jerusalem Post