Hillary Clinton Fires The First Shot For 2012: "Rising National Debt Is A Threat To National Security" (VIDEO)
Flashback clip for those who missed it the first time around.
Video: Hillary seems to call Obama a 'weak President' -- Aired Sep. 8, 2010
- "I think our rising debt levels pose a national security threat in 2 ways. It undermines our capacity to act in our own interest. And it does constrain us, where constraint may be undesirable. And it also sends a message of weakness internationally."
#
Longer version of the clip above. Offers more detail.
#
Video: Dick Morris says the comments were Hillary's opening salvo for 2012
#
Fox News Video: Monica Crowley reacts to Hillary's comments
Is the national debt a threat to national security?
##
Comment from SNK who blogs at Sonic Ninja Kitty
Furthermore, you should never offer to a recovering addict a sip of the toxin they once recklessly imbibed. Shame on you for offering, and shame on me for taking the bait, but I just cannot resist taking a swipe at the salacious pseudo feminism so vigorously proffered by the PUMAnistas. Dammit, SOMEBODY's got to do it!!
Here's the take: Hillary is a different rat. Still, she is a rat. Runner of the same damned freaking rat race. Same as it ever was.
The PUMAs are sheeple. At first glance they are fluffier and sweeter sheeple than the other sheeple, but they are sheeple all the same. They admire a chick with big brains and bigger balls, which Hillary certainly has. That woman could crush Sith Lloyd Blankfein before breakfast and finish off Bernanke, Geithner and Summers before mid morning snack time, if she really wanted. Dang, she is so good at what she does! SO GOOD!! {somebody slap me--3 deep breaths--get it together SNK!}
Problem is, when you challenge the PUMAs to scratch beyond the surface they will thwack you so hard your head will spin 6 ways till two weeks from next Sunday and then some. They give No Quarter (anyone here get that one? ha ha). They will absolutely REFUSE to examine her stances on sound money, the banker/politician cabal (oh, the irony of her firing her first shot in front of a CFR backdrop--nauseatingly creeptastic), and the debt-war cycle. Yet these are the things that are TRULY critical to ALL our futures. I'll tell you her stances: hates it, loves it, loves it. Disgusting.
Hillary will probably be our next president. She and her loyal PUMAs will lead us the rest of the way, skipping and throwing rose petals, into a collapsed currency, if we don't get to if before then. It may be a fluffier, sweeter collapse than we're all currently anticipating, but an unmitigated disaster nonetheless. They will then guide us into an even more 'caring' (argh--I cannot take all this 'caring'!), even larger and farther reaching 'because they are smarter and more wonderful than you stupid little people' government, depriving us of even MORE sovereignty and personal liberties than ever before, and plunging us further into debt slavery to our self anointed savior-criminals. Goodbye Thomas Jefferson, too bad you were a dude and not a chick:
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Is THAT what PUMAs want for our country? Guess so. PUMAs don't understand the real power and control mechanisms underlying our society. PUMAs ignore it because they are too busy feeling good about the fact their female leader has balls and brains. This makes me wonder. What the hell happened to these women that they are so blind and ignorant as to be satisfied with only those superficial qualities? Who destroyed their hearts so much so that they would settle for the smaller sphere of 'women's rights' over the larger and all inclusive sphere of LIBERTY FOR ALL?!? That is: F-O-R A-L-L. AAAALLLLLLLLLLLL. Pseudo feminism. Blech.
Any questions?
---
Nov 29, 2010 at 3:31 PM
Reader Comments (38)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yK1_vJt_vMg&feature=related
SNK, I expect to hear from you on this story...I know you PUMAs are not going to let her stay on the sidelines in 2012...
Good song z...
http://blog.american.com/?source=patrick.net&p=19189#logo-n-tagline
Check out the education cost bubble...
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100007530/how-house-prices-and-debts-are-building-ugly-tensions-between-parents-and-their-children/?source=patrick.net#post-100007530
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2010/sep/08/citylight1/?source=patrick.net#main_header
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-08/drunken-rowdy-bond-market-is-about-to-be-ill-commentary-by-mark-gilbert.html?source=patrick.net#related_categories_tags_top
By Richard Alford, a former economist at the New York Fed. Since then, he has worked in the financial industry as a trading floor economist and strategist on both the sell side and the buy side.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/09/richard-alford-fed-abandoned-its-duty-in-pre-crisis-housing-bubble-posture.html?source=patrick.net#wallops
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_britain_whale_thames
Pretty cool....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599201697300
United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303
Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:
"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are
official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt
entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth
hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a
coroner's report that will lead to our demise."
http://www.afn.org/~govern/bankruptcy.html
No one listened in 1993, and while we will hear many speeches over the next couple of years about the perils of debt, without ending the FED, it will all be just empty words.
http://cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN088462520100608
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001519.html#axzz0z6drFmdb
Try the FED's own calculator for what a dollar is worth today verses 1913.
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/
Furthermore, you should never offer to a recovering addict a sip of the toxin they once recklessly imbibed. Shame on you for offering, and shame on me for taking the bait, but I just cannot resist taking a swipe at the salacious pseudo feminism so vigorously proffered by the PUMAnistas. Dammit, SOMEBODY's got to do it!!
Here's the take: Hillary is a different rat. Still, she is a rat. Runner of the same damned freaking rat race. Same as it ever was.
The PUMAs are sheeple. At first glance they are fluffier and sweeter sheeple than the other sheeple, but they are sheeple all the same. They admire a chick with big brains and bigger balls, which Hillary certainly has. That woman could crush Sith Lloyd Blankfein before breakfast and finish off Bernanke, Geithner and Summers before mid morning snack time, if she really wanted. Dang, she is so good at what she does! SO GOOD!! {somebody slap me--3 deep breaths--get it together SNK!}
Problem is, when you challenge the PUMAs to scratch beyond the surface they will thwack you so hard your head will spin 6 ways till two weeks from next Sunday and then some. They give No Quarter (anyone here get that one? ha ha). They will absolutely REFUSE to examine her stances on sound money, the banker/politician cabal (oh, the irony of her firing her first shot in front of a CFR backdrop--nausiatingly creeptastic), and the debt-war cycle. Yet these are the things that are TRULY critical to ALL our futures. I'll tell you her stances: hates it, loves it, loves it. Disgusting.
Hillary will probably be our next president. She and her loyal PUMAs will lead us the rest of the way, skipping and throwing rose petals, into a collapsed currency, if we don't get to if before then. It may be a fluffier, sweeter collapse than we're all currently anticipating, but an unmitigated disaster nonetheless. They will then guide us into an even more 'caring' (argh--I cannot take all this 'caring'!), even larger and farther reaching 'because they are smarter and more wonderful than you stupid little people' government, depriving us of even MORE sovereignty and personal liberties than ever before, and plunging us further into debt slavery to our self anointed savior-criminals. Goodbye Thomas Jefferson, too bad you were a dude and not a chick:
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Is THAT what PUMAs want for our country? Guess so. PUMAs don't understand the real power and control mechanisms underlying our society. PUMAs ignore it because they are too busy feeling good about the fact their female leader has balls and brains. This makes me wonder. What the hell happened to these women that they are so blind and ignorant as to be satisfied with only those superficial qualities? Who destroyed their hearts so much so that they would settle for the smaller sphere of 'women's rights' over the larger and all inclusive sphere of LIBERTY FOR ALL?!? That is: F-O-R A-L-L. AAAALLLLLLLLLLLL. Pseudo feminism. Blech.
Any questions? LOL
Colin Powell Says Ground Zero Mosque Should Go Forward
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/09/09/colin-powell-says-ground-zero-mosque-should-go-forward/
"The terrorists win if we become terrified and . . . change who we are and what we are," Powell said, as he argued that it is crucial for Americans to remain true to the values that set the country apart from the rest of the world.
Again, is there anything this guy won’t do? My guess, no.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-jInHtu0e8&feature=related
Party Unity My Ass....for others who don't know....not being a Democrat (or a Republican) i was not clued in...
I'm going to post your commentary with the story...and link to your blog...
http://sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com/
##
Your comments have been added to the main text of the story...
----
(This is like throwing raw meat to the sharks, but...) wouldn't just about any ticket beat Obama-WHOEVER? Even more juicy, don't you think Sarah Palin (God forbid) would beat Obama at this point?
how about a ron paul and chris christie ticket....
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-10/15/c_131192186.htm
[snip]
NEW YORK, Oct. 14 (Xinhua) -- The United States should put economics at the center of its foreign policy and position itself to lead in a world where "security is shaped in boardrooms and on trading floors as well as on battlefields," U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said here Friday.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/18/us-libya-idUSTRE79F1FK20111018
Flashback: Hillary goes to Bosnia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BfNqhV5hg4
http://online.wsj.com/article/APa762d56dba2e4950ab6b227f3f5158dd.html
Thanks Hillary, You will be remembered well by your former constituents.
You came to New York, you saw New York, you killed Steuben.
http://www.thelocal.se/25552/20100316/#
Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
Crazy shit happening everywhere.
$6 Bil Vanishes From State Dept. Under Hillary Clinton - Judicial Watch
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/04/6-bil-vanishes-from-state-dept...
Reporter show photo's of 4 properties and asks them who owns them. (Hint) someone who claimed to be flat broke a few years ago.
http://patriotrising.com/2015/06/30/video-young-americans-shocked-to-learn-of-hillarys-multiple-mansions/
Watch and spread the word.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/25/us-usa-election-aflcio-endorsement-exclu-idUSKCN0PZ0PA20150725
In a possible setback for Hillary Clinton, the AFL-CIO’s political committee has recommended the nation’s largest labor union federation delay endorsing a candidate for the 2016 presidential race as it seeks to push her to be more supportive of its policies on issues such as trade and wages.
The committee on Monday voted unanimously to support the proposal, three union sources told Reuters. The recommendation will be presented at a July 29-30 meeting of the executive council of the federation, which will make the final decision. It could reject the recommendation and still go ahead with an endorsement, though one of the sources said that is unlikely.
The move highlights the pressures Clinton is facing to take a tough stand against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a proposed free trade deal backed by President Barack Obama but vigorously opposed by unions who see it as detrimental to jobs and wages in the U.S. Unions also want her to back labor-friendly policies on other issues, such as the minimum wage and the Federal Reserve.
The length of any delay in an endorsement may depend on how satisfied union leaders are with Clinton’s stance on TPP over the next few months.
Clinton, as well as Democrat rivals for the party’s nomination in the presidential race, Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley, and one of the candidates in the Republican race, Mike Huckabee, will be grilled by union leaders on the TPP and other issues at next week’s meeting.
“There will not be an endorsement now,” said a source who was at the political committee meeting on Monday. “There will be a lot of healthy discussion about how we approach the election."
http://www.ibtimes.com/cables-show-hillary-clintons-state-department-deeply-involved-trans-pacific-2032948
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/10/hillary-clinton-cracks-d...
When Hillary Rodham Clinton, the 2016 presidential candidate, unveiled her college affordability plan on Monday, she sounded every bit the critic of for-profit universities. But Mrs. Clinton, the spouse, benefited to the tune of millions of dollars from that same industry in a business relationship her husband enjoyed as recently as this spring.
Former President Bill Clinton collected more than $16 million from 2010 to 2014 as honorary chancellor of Laureate Education, a for-profit company that runs 80 education institutions around the globe, according to recently released tax returns. Four of its six U.S. colleges were flagged on the Education Department’s list of schools whose access to federal financial aid was being monitored out of concern over financial irresponsibility.
The Clinton Foundation also lists Laureate International Universities as one of its donors, giving $1 million to $5 million during the first half of this year. Mr. Clinton praised the company when he stepped down in late April, less than two weeks after his wife officially entered the presidential race.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/19/state-dept-destroyed-cli...
The State Department destroyed the BlackBerry devices issued to two top aides of former Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton and never issuedMrs. Clinton a device at all, officials told a federal court Wednesday in a filing that raises still more security questions.
The filing came a day before officials will have to appear in court to detail the steps they took to try to track down Mrs. Clinton’s emails, and whatever computers or other devices she may have used to send them.
udicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm, has sued to get a look at the emails of Mrs. Clinton and two top aides at State: Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills.
All three used email accounts not issued by the State Department to conduct government business, and all three are now under court orders to return those documents to the department to belatedly comply with open-records laws.
After Mrs. Clinton said she had deleted messages from her server,Judicial Watch prodded the State Department to try to dig up her electronic devices to see if any messages could be recovered.
State, on Wednesday, said that was impossible.
“[The department] does not believe that any personal computing device was issued by the department to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and has not located any such device,” administration officials said.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said that means Mrs. Clinton, who did use such devices during her time in office, must have issued one to herself — raising major national security questions.
“If the State Department was not providing secure email devices to Mrs. Clinton, who was? Best Buy? Target? Mrs. Clinton clearly did whatever she wanted, without regard to national security or federal records keeping laws,” Mr. Fitton said.
The State Department said Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin were issued BlackBerry devices, which were likely turned in at the end of their service.
“Because the devices issued to Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin would have been outdated models, in accordance with standard operating procedures those devices would have been destroyed or excessed,” thedepartment said.
Ms. Mills‘ lawyer has told the court she returned her emails to the government earlier this year, while Ms. Abedin’s lawyer said they will return her emails by next week.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/21/us-usa-election-clinton-emails...
(MUST READ).
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tech-company-no-indication-that-clintons-e-mail-server-was-wiped/2015/09/12/10c8ce52-58c6-11e5-abe9-27d53f250b11_story.html
The company that managed Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private e-mail server said it has “no knowledge of the server being wiped,” the strongest indication to date that tens of thousands of e-mails that Clinton has said were deleted could be recovered.
Clinton and her advisers have said for months that she deleted her personal correspondence from her time as secretary of state, creating the impression that 31,000 e-mails were gone forever.
There is a distinction between e-mails’ being deleted and a server being wiped. If e-mails are deleted or moved from a server, they appear to no longer exist on the device. But experts say, depending on the condition of the server, underlying data can remain on the device, and the e-mails can often be restored.
To make the information go away permanently, a server must be wiped — a process that includes overwriting the underlying data with gibberish, possibly several times.
That process, according to Platte River Networks, the Denver-based firm that has managed the system since 2013, apparently did not happen.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/05/us-exxon-mobil-climatechange-i...
The New York attorney general has launched an investigation into whether Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) misled the public about the risks of climate change or its investors about how those risks may hurt the company's oil business.
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman subpoenaed the company on Wednesday evening, demanding extensive financial records, emails and other documents, the attorney general's spokesman Stephen Barton told Reuters.
The New York Times first reported the news earlier on Thursday. (nyti.ms/1HuEJC8)
U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in late October had said she believed the U.S. Justice Department should investigate Exxon for failing to disclose data related to climate change.